Skip to main content

Why Universal Design?

In his TED talk, Michael Nesmith explains, via a translator, why we need universal design. The term "universal design" was coined by Ron Mace, and is defined as "the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design." Clearly, as a man with hearing issues, Michael has a unique perspective on the topic of universal design.
A helpful illustration given during his talk has to do with a doorknob. Maybe you haven't ever given doorknobs much thought (I sure hadn't before this TED talk), but that's usually how it goes for people who have no issues using a one on a daily basis. What about people using wheelchairs, or a mother pushing a stroller? Doorknobs become a bigger issue to those who do not have complete accessibility to them. However, a simple solution was created to fix this issue: the automatic sliding door. Michael explains, "This is such a universal design- it doesn't leave anyone out. Even animals can use it."
The goal of universal design aligns very closely to the goal of occupational therapy. Both OT and universal design are concerned with helping people participate in daily activities more easily and to the greatest extent possible. Some everyday activities are very simple (say, opening a door by turning a doorknob) until illness, injury or disease interrupt your ability to participate in them. Suddenly those activities aren't so simple anymore. Universal design, as well as other areas such as adaptive technology, and occupational therapy aim to find a way to help people-all people- live life to the fullest. Michael closed his speech with this powerful quote, "Disability drives innovation. The existence of disability forces you to come up with new solutions, it does not impair you." What a healthy and inspiring perspective to learn from and build upon!

Comments

  1. I absolutely agree! The TedTalk was really inspiring to me to think outside the box as well. The perspective we choose changes can make all the difference, and is essential to being a positive change in our environment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I loved the example given of the doorknob and how it puts things into perspective of the way the world is built! As occupational therapy students, it is so important to be aware of the way things are designed and the possible solutions our clients might use.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Such a good blog post! I definitely had not thought of doorknobs being unaccessible before this article either.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Children's Hand Skills Framework (CHSF)- OT Theory

The Children's Hand Skills Framework is a conceptual tool used to describe and analyze children's hand skills during assessment and intervention. The CHSF divides hand skills into 6 categories, based on the extent to which their hands are in contact with objects or parts of the body or not. These categories include manual gesture and body contact; these two categories do not involve contact with a specific object. The next categories are object-related hand skills, adaptive skilled hand use, bimanual use. The final category is general quality of hand use skills, such as accuracy or pace of children's hand skills. The population targeted with this theory, as indicated by the title, is children, and involves any diagnosis. Hand skills adequate enough to enable children to participate in daily occupations are considered functional in this framework. Object-related hand skills include actions such as reaching, turning/rotating, throwing, or catching an object. Adaptive skilled ...

Mock Interview Reflection

To prepare for this mock interview, I read through a few common OT-related interview questions and thought through my answers. I was originally planning to type out my answers, but I decided instead to only list bullet points to reflect on so that I did not come across as too scripted/rehearsed. I recently interviewed for a level II fieldwork rotation at St. Jude, and I went more in depth to prepare for that than I did for this interview in particular. Because of this, I felt like I had a good foundation going into this interview. Overall, I felt like the interview went well. I was able to answer all the questions without too much hesitation, and I felt like I answered them sufficiently, although I could have gone more in depth in some answers. Something that went differently than I expected was that I talked faster than I normally do. I learned that it is okay to take a pause and think through my answer before speaking in order to provide a more in-depth and full ans...