Skip to main content

Gray Areas

Looking back on my observation hours I completed prior to applying to OT school, there are some situations/ decisions I saw that seem a little less clear, knowing what I do now. Watching PTs or OTs do their jobs is one thing. They make decision-making look easy, when in reality there is so much more to the story than is visible to the observer (especially an observer with no graduate-level knowledge under their belt).
I observed PT and OT in an outpatient pediatric clinic as an intern for a semester. During that time, I learned a great deal about client interaction and numerous diagnoses that were commonly seen in the children that came to this clinic. However, I did not recognize at that time that the therapist's clinical decision-making was so involved. From my perspective, the therapists would take each client and each day as it came, utilizing whatever motivated the client that particular day. It is true that children are unpredictable and are motivated by different things at different times (for example, maybe they got a new toy for their birthday- the client could implement this into their therapy). However, looking back at those experiences now, I realize that the therapists had more of a plan than it seemed. They had to learn a great deal about each diagnosis and used their clinical experience to make realistic and motivating goals based on each individual client, and create treatment plans to get them there. While it might have seemed much simpler to me, such as simply picking a game to play for the day, the therapists actually have a challenging task of working towards those specific goals while also keeping the clients motivated. They also have to analyze the client's performance during each activity, in much more detail than one might realize. With children, this can be especially tricky. I have a new found respect for those therapists, their skill and their patience in treating their clients. I look forward to learning more about theories in OT and hope to have the same skills and knowledge as those therapists.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Universal Design?

In his TED talk, Michael Nesmith explains, via a translator, why we need universal design. The term "universal design" was coined by Ron Mace, and is defined as "the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design." Clearly, as a man with hearing issues, Michael has a unique perspective on the topic of universal design. A helpful illustration given during his talk has to do with a doorknob. Maybe you haven't ever given doorknobs much thought (I sure hadn't before this TED talk), but that's usually how it goes for people who have no issues using a one on a daily basis. What about people using wheelchairs, or a mother pushing a stroller? Doorknobs become a bigger issue to those who do not have complete accessibility to them. However, a simple solution was created to fix this issue: the automatic sliding door. Michael explains, "This is such a univer...

Children's Hand Skills Framework (CHSF)- OT Theory

The Children's Hand Skills Framework is a conceptual tool used to describe and analyze children's hand skills during assessment and intervention. The CHSF divides hand skills into 6 categories, based on the extent to which their hands are in contact with objects or parts of the body or not. These categories include manual gesture and body contact; these two categories do not involve contact with a specific object. The next categories are object-related hand skills, adaptive skilled hand use, bimanual use. The final category is general quality of hand use skills, such as accuracy or pace of children's hand skills. The population targeted with this theory, as indicated by the title, is children, and involves any diagnosis. Hand skills adequate enough to enable children to participate in daily occupations are considered functional in this framework. Object-related hand skills include actions such as reaching, turning/rotating, throwing, or catching an object. Adaptive skilled ...

Mock Interview Reflection

To prepare for this mock interview, I read through a few common OT-related interview questions and thought through my answers. I was originally planning to type out my answers, but I decided instead to only list bullet points to reflect on so that I did not come across as too scripted/rehearsed. I recently interviewed for a level II fieldwork rotation at St. Jude, and I went more in depth to prepare for that than I did for this interview in particular. Because of this, I felt like I had a good foundation going into this interview. Overall, I felt like the interview went well. I was able to answer all the questions without too much hesitation, and I felt like I answered them sufficiently, although I could have gone more in depth in some answers. Something that went differently than I expected was that I talked faster than I normally do. I learned that it is okay to take a pause and think through my answer before speaking in order to provide a more in-depth and full ans...