Skip to main content

Driving and Community Mobility


What stood out to me during the lecture on driving and community mobility was how many different client populations could benefit from occupational therapy interventions in this area. Some diagnoses mentioned that are commonly seen by a certified driving rehabilitation specialist were traumatic brain injury, stroke, spinal cord injury, amputations, Alzheimer’s Disease, cerebral palsy, and muscular dystrophy. Some services provided to clients within this area of driving and community mobility are work hardening, driving rehab, low vision rehab, vestibular rehab, industrial services, and pressure mapping/wheelchair assessment. Adaptive driving programs aim to assess individuals for safety and potential to drive, evaluate persons with disabilities for appropriate adaptive equipment, and to train individuals in use of adaptive equipment and/or compensation techniques for driving. Driving/community mobility is a huge aspect of independence, so this is a very important and powerful area that OTs can address.

One way in which an OT could provide an intervention to a client with a spinal cord injury would be to provide hand controls for their car and have a session dedicated to practicing using them, first in the clinic and then in a vehicle after the client felt comfortable. Another intervention could be for an elderly client with Alzheimer’s Disease. The OT could provide education for the client on their disease progression in order to give them insight into what they should expect to happen/how the disease progresses. They could also provide them with cognitive techniques/exercises in order to increase cognitive reserve, and they could also teach them how to drive more safely such as only driving in familiar areas and avoiding driving out of state in order to decrease the likelihood of getting lost. For someone with vision issues, an OT could recommend a larger rear-view mirror or a dash cloth to reduce glare.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Universal Design?

In his TED talk, Michael Nesmith explains, via a translator, why we need universal design. The term "universal design" was coined by Ron Mace, and is defined as "the design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design." Clearly, as a man with hearing issues, Michael has a unique perspective on the topic of universal design. A helpful illustration given during his talk has to do with a doorknob. Maybe you haven't ever given doorknobs much thought (I sure hadn't before this TED talk), but that's usually how it goes for people who have no issues using a one on a daily basis. What about people using wheelchairs, or a mother pushing a stroller? Doorknobs become a bigger issue to those who do not have complete accessibility to them. However, a simple solution was created to fix this issue: the automatic sliding door. Michael explains, "This is such a univer...

Children's Hand Skills Framework (CHSF)- OT Theory

The Children's Hand Skills Framework is a conceptual tool used to describe and analyze children's hand skills during assessment and intervention. The CHSF divides hand skills into 6 categories, based on the extent to which their hands are in contact with objects or parts of the body or not. These categories include manual gesture and body contact; these two categories do not involve contact with a specific object. The next categories are object-related hand skills, adaptive skilled hand use, bimanual use. The final category is general quality of hand use skills, such as accuracy or pace of children's hand skills. The population targeted with this theory, as indicated by the title, is children, and involves any diagnosis. Hand skills adequate enough to enable children to participate in daily occupations are considered functional in this framework. Object-related hand skills include actions such as reaching, turning/rotating, throwing, or catching an object. Adaptive skilled ...

Level II Fieldwork

As I am starting to prepare for my level II fieldwork rotations, the biggest thing I am trying to keep in mind is that I am not expected to come into these new settings/situations as an expert. As a student, I am not going to be expected to be perfect, as I am still learning and growing. While it is important to prepare and do my best, I know that my fieldwork educators are going to teach me and push me along during my three months in each setting. One quality that fieldwork educators like to see in their students is confidence. While I might not be confident in all of my skills yet, I should be confident in my ability to learn and improve. Another positive quality in a fieldwork student is being responsible and taking advantage of your own learning. This includes being on time, being alert, and doing work at home (researching diagnoses, interventions, familiarizing yourself with assessments/precautions, etc). I think that the ideal fieldwork student is motivated, ask...